Proin vitae nisl non felis tincidunt viverra. Nunc et diam id ante scelerisque hendrerit a vel dolor. Sed non velit nec augue interdum egestas eget vel orci. Suspendisse commodo elit eu purus hendrerit lacinia. Donec eu mauris diam. Suspendisse ac tortor mi, a pretium enim. Donec consequat sollicitudin luctus. Nam tortor mauris, rhoncus viverra sodales id, volutpat sed velit. Fusce nec malesuada nunc. Aenean vitae dictum nunc. Donec laoreet commodo lacus, vel commodo magna rhoncus sed. Integer nec purus elit. Integer a viverra tellus. Etiam consectetur felis a augue sagittis vel tempus leo elementum. Mauris ut sollicitudin neque.

A mercurial figure that has been seen singing and driving K.I.T.T. He is reputed to have supernatural powers and to have sold his soul to the devil. Future German Chancellor.

Still here? Well, then you’ve earned yourself two quotes from the political economist Karl marx:

Do I obey economic laws if I extract money by offering my body for sale,… — Then the political economist replies to me: You do not transgress my laws; but see what Cousin Ethics and Cousin Religion have to say about it. My political economic ethics and religion have nothing to reproach you with, but — But whom am I now to believe, political economy or ethics? — The ethics of political economy is acquisition, work, thrift, sobriety — but political economy promises to satisfy my needs. … It stems from the very nature of estrangement that each sphere applies to me a different and opposite yardstick — ethics one and political economy another; for each is a specific estrangement of man and focuses attention on a particular field of estranged essential activity, and each stands in an estranged relation to the other.

Marx, Human Needs & the division of Labour (1844)

Economists explain how production takes place in the above-mentioned relations, but what they do not explain is how these relations themselves are produced, that is, the historical movement which gave them birth. M. Proudhon, taking these relations for principles, categories, has merely to put into order these thoughts.

Marx, Poverty of Philosophy (1847)

David may not be the ideal recipient for this letter, but I think he has proved himself worthy of it anyway.